Welcome to the Cybersecurity Readiness Podcast Site
Jan. 18, 2023

To trust or not to trust: the overwhelming challenge

Clinical psychologist Beatrice Cadet, Scientist Integrator at Netherland's Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), draws upon multiple concepts such as 'learned helplessness' to explain why people still fall for phishing attacks despite the training. Beatrice emphasizes the need to factor in human behavioral traits and motivational triggers when developing social engineering solutions and training.

To access and download the entire podcast summary with discussion highlights --

https://www.dchatte.com/episode-43-to-trust-or-not-to-trust-the-overwhelming-challenge/

Clinical psychologist Beatrice Cadet, Scientist Integrator at Netherland's Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), draws upon multiple concepts such as 'learned helplessness' to explain why people still fall for phishing attacks despite the training. Beatrice emphasizes the need to factor in human behavioral traits and motivational triggers when developing social engineering solutions and training.

To access and download the entire podcast summary with discussion highlights --

https://www.dchatte.com/episode-43-to-trust-or-not-to-trust-the-overwhelming-challenge/

 

Connect with Host Dr. Dave Chatterjee and Subscribe to the Podcast

Please subscribe to the podcast, so you don't miss any new episodes! And please leave the show a rating if you like what you hear. New episodes release every two weeks.

Connect with Dr. Chatterjee on these platforms:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dchatte/

Website: https://dchatte.com/

Cybersecurity Readiness Book: https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Readiness-Holistic-High-Performance-Approach/dp/1071837338

https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/cybersecurity-readiness/book275712

Latest Publication: https://www.imd.org/ibyimd/magazine/preventing-security-breaches-must-start-at-the-top/

Transcript

Introducer:

Welcome to the Cybersecurity Readiness Podcast

 

 


Introducer:

Series with Dr. Dave Chatterjee. Dr. Chatterjee is the author of

 

 


Introducer:

the book Cybersecurity Readiness: A Holistic and

 

 


Introducer:

High-Performance Approach, a SAGE publication. He has been

 

 


Introducer:

studying cybersecurity for over a decade, authored and edited

 

 


Introducer:

scholarly papers, delivered talks, conducted webinars and

 

 


Introducer:

workshops, consulted with companies and served on a

 

 


Introducer:

cybersecurity SWAT team with Chief Information Security

 

 


Introducer:

officers. Dr. Chatterjee is Associate Professor of

 

 


Introducer:

Management Information Systems at the Terry College of

 

 


Introducer:

Business, the University of Georgia. As a Duke University

 

 


Introducer:

Visiting Scholar, Dr. Chatterjee has taught in the Master of

 

 


Introducer:

Engineering in Cybersecurity program at the Pratt School of

 

 


Introducer:

Engineering.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Hello, everyone, Happy New Year. I'm

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

delighted to welcome you to this episode of the Cybersecurity

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Readiness Podcast Series. Our discussion today will focus on

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

finding a balance between our natural need to trust and the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

caution that needs to be there to deal with all forms of online

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

cyber attacks. In fact, I experienced a phishing attack

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

this morning, and I'll get into that later on. I'm delighted to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

welcome Beatrice Cadet from Amsterdam, Netherlands. Beatrice

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

is a scientist integrator at Netherland's Organisation for

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Applied Scientific Research (TNO). With a background in

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

intelligence and psychology, Beatrice has specialized in

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

cybersecurity by taking an integrative approach working on

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

bridging the gap between human and the technical aspects. So

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Beatrice, before we get into the details of managing trust, let's

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

talk about you a little bit, share with the listeners some

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

highlights of your professional journey.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yes. So again, thank you so much for having me,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

I'm excited about the discussion that we're about to have. So,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

about me as you just said, I studied with a master's in

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

intelligence and security management from Strasbourg

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

University in France, that gave me quite a multidisciplinary

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

background within the social sciences area. From there, I

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

knew I was interested in tech. So I tried to target my

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

internships more into the online safety and security, which led

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

me to work for a startup in Dublin that is called Zico that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

works for online safety for children. And then I thought I

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

needed to gain some technical knowledge to properly work in

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

cyber security, which led me to the Netherlands where I still am

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

today. And I worked for a company called Red Sox Security,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

cyber threat intelligence. So I really dove into the technical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

world and worked with a technical team, my goal being to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

get some knowledge and some skills. But eventually I found a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

really interesting position to be a social scientist or more

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

human approach person within the technical world and the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

technical people. And from them to my current position where

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

indeed, I know that what we do is quite multidisciplinary.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

However, online safety and security, information

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

manipulation. So that's the core of the content that we're

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

working on within the type of work we do could be a scientific

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

article, as much as trainings or workshops for police or the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Ministry of Defense, right now. I'm focusing now on the human

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

factors. So that got me to start a bachelor in psychology just to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

add that to the background in security, and mostly

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

cybersecurity. And I got hooked, and I became a clinical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

psychologist.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Wonderful. In fact, I don't believe I've

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

had a clinical psychologist on my show yet. So you are the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

first one.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

nice!

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

I'm looking forward to learning a lot from

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

your insights and expertise. So from your lens, from a

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

psychologist's lens, what does the social engineering trends

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

look like? What can we expect in the future?

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yes. So one thing I always say is that, of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

course, criminals innovate, also a lot in social engineering. So

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

we see new tricks and new ways to catch people, especially with

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

new technologies. And I think that's something to really look,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

look up look to, and look at, sorry, because, for example,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

deep fakes, and it's something that we need to look for in the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

future, but that is also already here. I think deep fakes will be

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

more and more used. And we've seen it this year already. I

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

mean, 2022 We've seen it, so more and more defects. They use

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

technology more and more to manipulate people. And I always

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

say that social engineering can be approached from the two ways,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

right. So it's using psychology, or I mean human manipulation to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

conduct a technical cyber attacks, but it could also be

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

using technologies and technical tricks to actually manipulate

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

people. So that's something I like to highlight when I talk

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

about social engineering. So as I said, Yeah, innovation, so new

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

tricks, but one thing that I always see is that all tricks

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

also always, are always here. And when I was working on cyber

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

threat intelligence, I would work on some phishing labs and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

try to analyze some phishing campaigns. And I would find some

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

campaigns that beside having different types of indicators of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

compromise, different different IP addresses, for example, the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

visual aspect of the campaign would be exactly the same. So

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

for example, Elon Musk is giving away 20 Bitcoins. And so that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

shows that social engineering in the end is nothing new, and that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

we're still falling for the same old trick. And it's not proper

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

to cybersecurity, social engineering has existed since

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

forever. So with that in mind, I think, yeah, what we can see in

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

the trends and in the landscape for the upcoming year and years

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

is really looking at the old trick, look, still trying to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

bring more awareness because we're still falling for the same

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

sort of campaigns. And additionally, technology is

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

being more and more used to manipulate people even more

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

effectively.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

I can't agree with you more, when you

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

say, we are still falling for the same tricks. We as humans,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

we are naturally inclined to trust, we are very vulnerable or

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

susceptible or gullible, we end up believing what we see. Early

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

in the morning, I saw an email supposedly from a major credit

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

card company, and I have a card with them, stating that a

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

certain amount could not be paid, so I need to log in and

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

make the payment. It looked so genuine. They had the graphics,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

right, they had the logos, right. And it was very well

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

crafted. It wasn't the typical phishing emails with grammatical

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

errors and stuff like that. I was almost thinking of clicking

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

on that link. But then I said, No, I won't, I'm just going to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

call them. And yes, I did expand the subject line to check on the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

address. I couldn't tell if it was a genuine address, or a fake

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

address. Instead of clicking on anything, or replying, I just

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

called them this morning, and said, I received this email and

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

she went into my account checked and said, Sir, very smart of

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

you, you picked up on something that you should not be clicking

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

on. The reason I share this example is, that I have now

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

become so paranoid, anytime I see an email, I scan it

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

thoroughly. I refuse to click on any attachments unless I know

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

for sure who the sender is. And when in doubt, verify, right?

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Just call and ask. So it was kind of interesting that I had

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that experience this morning, and we are now discussing about

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

whether to trust or not to trust.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yeah, good timing!

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Yeah, I know, good timing. Beatrice,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

during our planning discussion, you mentioned a few things that

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

I want to pick up on. You talked about the need for

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

socio-technical solutions to counter social engineering. And

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

there are a lot of solutions out there. It might be very valuable

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

for you to highlight for the benefit of the listeners, what

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

are some of these solutions?

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yes. So when I mentioned the need for social

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

technical solutions, I think, for example, on the technical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

side to the filtering solutions, for example, for the email, if

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

we're talking about phishing emails, yes, I think this is a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

good first step. We need that in place, we need that to be

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

efficient. When I think of social solutions, it all comes

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

with awareness, it all comes with training. And the reason

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

why I say this social technical solutions, because there is so

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

much so many campaigns, so much social engineering going on,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that we cannot expect everyone to always be at their best ready

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

to check everything. And I would like to rebound on the example,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

you just mentioned your example from this morning, You're in the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

fields, so you're more aware, maybe and you may be a little

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

bit more used to it. So that gives you a bit more awareness,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

maybe than most people, but also you took the time and that was

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

time consuming know to have to check all the different

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

elements, to doubt, and then still to call them. So not

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

everyone always has that time or decides to always take that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

time. So that's why even though people would be very well

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

trained into spotting every single phishing email

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

whatsoever, I think there would still be some vulnerabilities at

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

some points, the same way, that a filter on the emails also has

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

some vulnerabilities and might not filter all the phishing

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

emails or filter too many of them. So yeah, that's a few

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

examples I can think of now, when I'm talking about social

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

technical solutions.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Yeah, I mean, I don't enjoy calling

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

credit card companies in the morning, to follow up follow up

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

on things because it takes up a lot of my time. Yeah. And that's

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

not the way I want to start my day. But we are in this

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

environment where we have to be vigilant, we have to be patient.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

It brings to mind an episode I did recently on multifactor

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

authentication and the fatigue that's associated with it. The

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

subject matter expert told me that many developers don't want

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

to go through that authentication process,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

especially when they are dealing with 15-20 different

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

applications. Because it is bothersome, it is time

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

consuming, they become impatient. Unfortunately, we are

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

in an environment where we have to be mindful, we have to be

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

careful, we have to prioritize. Finances are something that I

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

carefully monitor, especially my credit card transactions. If I

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

know anything that could be problematic, I immediately get

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

into an investigative mood and I probe further. I give it a

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

priority, though it's not something that I would like to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

give priority, but I am left with no choice. So that's kind

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

of the way I do things. And I'm sure many others, your thoughts?

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yes. And I think it's great. Ideally, we should

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

always be very mindful of every single emails, every single

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

text, even every single phone call or interaction with people.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

The thing is, as you said earlier in this talk, is it

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

biologically human beings are inclined to trust. And then of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

course, it depends on the personality, not everyone will

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

have the same extent, that same inclination to trust, and also

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

depends on your experiences. And I would say one of the problems

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

with cybersecurity in general is that most people don't feel the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

burn, when dependence of you know how you learn that fire

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

burns, well, you burn your finger, it's painful, and you

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

tend not to do it again, because you learned from the pain. Most

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

people that got cut with cyber security issue, so a phishing

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

email or whatsoever, they might not know that they have, that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

their data is out on the Dark Web, or they might know that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

there has been a data leak, for example, but they don't really

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

know what it represents. So I think it's also very difficult

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

for people who are not very knowledgeable or used to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

cybersecurity to choose to put that as a priority the same way

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that you do. Yep. So yeah, I think that is a very important

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

factor to consider. And as you said, there's so many emails as

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

well. And to go back on that need for social technical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

solution. That's also why I think it's important because

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

there's so many simulations coming all the time from

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

different directions, that it's very difficult to keep

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

everything as a priority and to be untrusting of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

everything you have come across every day.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Exactly. And we multiprocess so much

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

these days, right? And we are using different devices. Yes.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

And so it's like second nature to us, we're just doing stuff.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

So to have that natural filter, that a little bit of security

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

paranoia, which would force us to stop, think, take unnecessary

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

action, before we move on to the next thing. For that to become

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

muscle memory, for lack of a better word that comes through

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

training, you're exactly right. That also comes through, again,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

I'm not a psychologist, but I'm gonna put myself out there and

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

hypothesize or suggest that we have to start really believing

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that this is a problem. And like you used the excellent,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

excellent analogy or metaphor of the burn that do we really need

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

to get burned to appreciate what should be done proactively. We

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

have to kind of learn to be a little more cautious and cant

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

just throw caution to the winds as they say. I was speaking with

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

a subject matter expert in the last episode that was published,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

and she's a expert in cybersecurity technologies. And

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

I asked her a question, I said, Do you think we'll ever get to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that stage where humans don't have to worry about making

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

mistakes, because we have great technologies that will cover for

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

us? And she answered in the affirmative. She said yes, I am

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

optimistic that there will come a time sooner than later where

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

we don't have have to be this vigilant. And I hope that her

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

words come through. But until then we just have to be careful,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

right?

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yeah, exactly. And also be very pragmatic about

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

it, it most likely will happen, I think, maybe coming to the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

state where we don't have to be that worried about it will be

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that first because we have more training. So we have more

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

feeling of control on what we can do about it, that's very

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

important. But also a point where we'll have better

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

technology, maybe to counter this, complimentary, but also

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that we'll have more resilience processes, so that you will know

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that, okay, even if you're making mistakes, there are ways

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

to recover, or there are ways to, unless all the developments,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

maybe with insurances or like processes where you can, okay,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

making mistakes, but you're not alone in there. Because as of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

now, there are very little processes in place. And even

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

with the police, they're trying to have more people report cyber

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

crime, but it's still very low. So I think that as a compliment

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

could also help us get to a stage where we're a little bit

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

more. Yeah, yeah, he's all about it. Yep, that can be done as

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

well on something you say, with training and the importance of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

mindset. There is one concept, it's a sort of pyramid of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

different concepts, you need to get to effective training. And

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

the bottom line of the pyramid is actually awareness and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

mindset. And if you don't have that, you can do every single

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

training you want, it won't have the effect that you're

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

expecting, you really need to have people understand why

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

they're training on this, why they have to work on this

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

specific skills or specific concept, or issue. And if you

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

don't have that, you won't get the effects you want. So that's

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

really important to understand why we need actually to get

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

better at this

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Yep, that connects with what I often say

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

is, we have to get the user buy-in, unless the buy-in is

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

there, unless the user recognizes the importance of

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

doing certain things, or following certain guidelines,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

following certain best practices, they may not be

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

willing to do so. And as much as we might preach that, lets, be

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

proactive, let's not be reactive. But unfortunately, the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

results, the statistics, suggest that we are reactive. And we

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

learn best after a major catastrophe. If we can use the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

pandemic as an example, despite all these great organizations

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

out there, terrific scientists out there, we still couldn't, we

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

were not proactive about it, we made a great recovery. Thanks to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

the scientists, we have the vaccines and all credit to them,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

thanks to all the healthcare workers who've done yeomen

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

service. But having said that, I'm not so sure that we have

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

another round of a pandemic, are we better prepared for it now

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that we have experienced one? I'm not so sure, I'm still very

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

pessimistic about it. Because we are naturally not again, this is

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

a hunch I'm not a psychologist, maybe you can shed some light,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

we are naturally not inclined to be proactive.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

And I would fear that maybe if there would be

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

another pandemic, we would try to apply the lessons from the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

one we just we've just been through, which is still been

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

happening. Right. I would hope that we would learn to be

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

proactive by taking the lessons learned, but also looking

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

towards the future as well. And mixing that up together. Yes.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

And it's similar to what could be happening sometimes in

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

cybersecurity that we just think, oh, yeah, there is that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

threat. So we apply this, but the threats are moving, and it's

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

always a cat and mouse game. So how do we become as defenders as

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

innovative as the criminals, right? How do we try to make the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

gap between the two sides a little bit smaller, that's also

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

very important.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Exactly. And I want to emphasize what you

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

just said, it is important to learn from the past. But it's

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

also important to recognize that the future might present

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

challenges that have to be dealt with, and we may not be prepared

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

for it from our past experiences. So therefore, it

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

requires a mix of Yes, informed insights from the past plus the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

innovations that's going on because we have to think

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

proactively of what are the future types of attacks that

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

might be launched, and how can we protect ourselves? When I say

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

how can we I'm talking about individuals, groups,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

organizations, nations at any level, I think this approach us

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

a deliberate a proactive approach is is valuable

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

irrespective. So awesome! Once again, going back to my planning

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

document here, I took notes when we were talking and you made a

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

very poignant statement. You said "overall, I want to debunk

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

the emotional aspects of social engineering. We need to be more

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

pragmatic about it. We all fall for it at some point. But how to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

best avoid it and recover. Expand a little bit about

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

emotional aspects of social engineering?

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yes. So I would say motional, maybe also a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

little bit seeing it as a buzzword we hear so often that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

humans are the weakest link, and it's because of the people and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

stuff. And yes, it is true. Because in the end, even though

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

cybercrime cybersecurity is all about tech, behind the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

computers, behind the phones, you have humans on both sides of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

it. So completely agree with this. But being sort of alarming

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

about social engineering as much as it is good and important and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

necessary, it has to have its limits. Because first, there is

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

a point that we haven't mentioned yet. But there's a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

psychological concept that is called learned helplessness is

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that people feel so overwhelmed, and they feel like no matter

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

what they do, it won't help anything. So and many people

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

have that. And it has been shown in research in cybersecurity,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that the reason why sometimes things don't work, or people

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

still fall for phishing and stuff, is because they know that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

no matter what they do, or they think that no matter what they

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

do, they will get scammed anyway. And it's so overwhelming

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that they prefer to just drop it and be like, Yeah, I have

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

nothing to hide or whatever happened happens. So that's why

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

I think like being a bit less emotional about social

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

engineering being a threat, but being just pragmatic about it,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

like it is there, it has always been there, it will still be

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

there, I think that could be actually a very good step

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

towards being more protected against it. So that's the core

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

point I would like to make. Yes,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

well made, when you said learned

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

helplessness, it immediately brought to mind an experience

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that I had a couple of years ago when I was gathering data for my

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

book. And I spoke to a senior leader of a major healthcare

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

company. And he made a very interesting statement. He said,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

we are such a large organization, we have so many

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

systems interfacing with other external systems, we connect

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

with all kinds of IoT devices, it's very overwhelming to stay

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

on top of everything and know where our vulnerabilities are,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

where we are, we are strong. So you almost feel helpless. And

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

you're kind of hoping, to use his words, that we get attacked,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

so we get to know where our weaknesses are. And of course,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that is not the approach or mindset that I recommend, or

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

anybody for that matter would recommend. But that speaks to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

what you just said about learned helplessness. Whether it's a

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

leader of a major organization, or whether individuals, I have

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

gone through some cybersecurity certifications, some

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

cybersecurity training, they can get complicated, there's so much

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

to learn so much to know. And so for a regular person who just

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

wants to do their thing and be happy and not get too caught up

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

with this stuff. They're like, Oh, I don't want to know the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

details. If something were to happen, I'll deal with it when

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

it happens. So that's precisely I think, what ends up happening

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

with humans, because human mind can only absorb or deal with so

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

much complexity, right? We have, we have our cognitive

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

limitations. And when it goes beyond that, we are like, Okay,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

nevermind, let's just hope for the best I'm not gonna try

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

anymore. So I think that point is extremely well made,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

We have our cognitive limitations, yet, we

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

still make 1000s and 1000s of decisions every day without even

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

noticing it. So that's the whole thing. Also, we're going back to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

trust, trusting, not trusting so many decisions are automated.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

And we can control everything. And also, criminals know that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

they're also human beings, and they know how to trick us. So

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that overwhelming feeling they know how to use it. And for

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

example, you get your email, you saw in the morning, and you said

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

something about your card in the morning when you just woke up,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

maybe so then it's even harder to be rational. And they know

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

exactly how to do this. So yes, bringing a bit more peace to it

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

being like, Okay, this is it. You need to be aware of this. We

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

need to train on this. We need to get better at this but also

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

without Yeah. dramatizing it, I think it's very important to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

actually make concrete progress.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Fantastic. So let's talk a little bit about

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

the zero trust approach. And if I understand this approach

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

properly, essentially, the assumption is being made that

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

let's try to be as secure as possible every step of the way.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Use a combination of physical, technical and administrative

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

controls, have a micro have micro segmented networks. So

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

when a user wants to move from one network to another, they

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

have to again authenticate. So have checks and balances every

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

step of the way. I was reading somewhere, they used an example

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

of going to a rock concert, and you get checked in once, but

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

then you again, get checked in and again, kept checked in

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

before you get to your seat. So having these multiple layers of

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

defense, for lack of a better word, or another very popular

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

terminology out there is defense in depth, those are being

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

advocated big time they are being considered best practices.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

From a psychologist's standpoint, what is your

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

perception on this zero trust framework? Or zero trust

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

approach to cybersecurity governance?

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yeah. So as a psychologist in cybersecurity,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

my first thought is thinking yes, indeed, that that makes

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

sense. And layering security is yeah, it's just just makes

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

sense, right. But then, as a psychologist first what comes to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

my mind is, we need to pay attention that all of those

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

measures, and all of those technical aspects, physical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

points of security, are adapted to how human behave, you know,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

because often we try to create solutions. So I'm thinking

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

concrete, technical solutions that are actually not adapted to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

how users behave. And that can be the key to failure, if we

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

don't think about it. So I think it's a great, great point to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

have those different policies in place to have those different

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

infrastructure security infrastructures in place, but we

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

need to make sure that they're not too heavy for the user. And

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

of course, it's easy for me to say this, right? It's ideally,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

we always want this, but it's important to develop it as well

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

always, with the user in mind and thinking, okay, how can we,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

instead of thinking, let's develop the best technical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

solution, and then fit it into the user process, we need to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

think ahead and think, Okay, we need to have a sort of technical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

solutions in place, how do we make sure that the user will

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

adopt it? And of course, the user might have to adapt to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

adopt, but how can we make sure we we do that in the easiest way

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

possible. And then when it comes to thinking, zero trust, I think

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

as much as it's great for policies and technical

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

solutions, we need to again, as we said earlier, remind

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

ourselves that having a human being always suspect something,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

won't happen. It's just not possible all day every day.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Exactly. And I hope listeners if they

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

have anything to do with training in their organizations,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

or if they have the insolence, I hope that whoever is involved in

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

developing a training program include the psychologists in the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

team, because you need technical specialist, no doubt, you need

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

strategists, no doubt, but you also need the psychologists who

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

understand human behavior, because, after all, these

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

solutions, many of the solutions if not all, many of the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

solutions, which involve human interaction, or which are going

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

to be used by humans, unless you understand human psyche, human

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

mindset, the solutions are not going to be very effective. I'd

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

like to briefly mention a research that was carried out a

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

couple of years ago, where they trained a group of people to see

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

whether post training, the percentage who fell for phishing

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

attacks would drastically decline. Unfortunately, the

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

research found the variation wasn't significant. In other

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

words, the training didn't prove to be the phishing-related

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

training didn't prove to be effective, and the researchers

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

justified the explanation or tried to explain the findings by

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

saying that there are so many human factors such as innate

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

curiosity, for lack of a better better word greediness. If we

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

see an email which is promising a certain sum of money if we

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

click a link and play a game or throw a dice whatever we are

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

inclined to do so because we want to believe that yes, there

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

is some something to be gained from this action, it may not be

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

fake, we almost force ourselves to believe it, because we have

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

the need for money, let's say or, and like you said earlier,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

we are many of us are often naturally inclined to trust. So

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

it is so important that the human psychology is taken into

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

consideration by involving subject matter experts such as

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

yourself when training programs are developed. Would you like to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

add to that?

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yes, there are two points I wrote down for

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

myself. Let's start with the role of a psychologist in such a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

team, I think is in knowing how people function knowing how to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

investigate how specific groups of people function And as well

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

or specific individuals even. And that's something that I

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

often hear. So I speak with a lot of technical people, of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

course, and I give a guest lecture every year at the Hague

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

University of Applied Science, and it's a technical crowd. And

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

what I recognize often is that technical people tend to think

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

as one zero. And I don't want to generalize, because that's

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

exactly the point I'm about to make. But I hear that very

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

often. And I get some people asking me, but how do you know

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

this for people? How do you approach this for people? And

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

there's no exact rule. And that's one thing you learn when

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

you study psychology, is that okay? You will learn specific,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

especially, in my case, clinical psychology, you will learn

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

specific syndromes or how to recognize things, but the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

experience will never be the same for two individuals. So you

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

really need to learn how specific people function and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

apply that knowledge to the knowledge, the general knowledge

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

we have on human beings, and then bring that to the group of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

developers or whoever you're working with. And so there's

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that role that psychologists can have in a team. But then there's

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

also the role of often translating between different

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

disciplines, you mentioned, strategies, technical people

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that you may have in a team. And that that's a position I've

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

often been myself, of actually understanding how the different

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

group of people working on the project, think and communicate,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

and how to because multidisciplinary work is still

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

very complicated. And it's very valuable, and it's what we need

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

to go towards. But it's very complicated. So having a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

psychologist sometimes can help bind these different disciplines

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

together. So yeah, that was the first point that I had on what

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

you just

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

said. And what was the other one? You

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

said? You made? Two points? Yeah. The other one was,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

general knowledge on cognitive

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

psychology. So yeah, this is how the brain works. This, this is

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

how people make decisions and stuff. This is very important,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

of course. But one thing that we tend to forget is that one

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

person won't make the same kinds of decisions every single day,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

the context is so important to how you will make a decision.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

And even the most rational person may at some point, make a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

very emotional decision. And so that's also what you're talking

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

about, we're talking about a seeing that email that will

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

promise you some money. And then in a moment of weakness, you

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

might decide that, Oh, you want to believe in this. And what you

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

say is really true, because sometimes we decide to trust for

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

the wrong reasons. And so we're out for the wrong reasons, or

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

because of some sort of contextual influence. And my

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

colleagues and I two years ago, wrote a paper on disinformation

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

during COVID-19. And one of the statements that we made in the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

discussion is that maybe the context of the lockdown and, and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

the pandemic happening, influence why so many people

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

started to believe in disinformation, and people that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

might not believe in it before the pandemic, but in this

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

specific context, with that much uncertainty with mental

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

disorders being on the rise, so I'm thinking anxiety and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

depression, this, like anxiety and depression, they affects

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

your emotional system, right. And we saw that the narratives

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that were played in disinformation, played on the

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

emotions that are affected by depression and anxiety. So that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

being hopelessness, having difficulties dealing with

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

uncertainty, being very anxious, being very angry, and so yeah,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

those people in normal times, they might have not fallen for

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

this. But now they were triggered on specific aspects of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

the human factors in a specific context. And that's why it

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

worked. So that's why I think, beyond the being well aware

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

about social engineering campaigns and cybercrime in

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

general, it's also very important to be self aware, and

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

to know that, to know your own limits, actually, to know that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

sometimes you might be overstressed and overwhelmed.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

And you're not going to be able to make the same type of

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

decision as if you're perfectly healthy and mentally well

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

balanced. And nobody will be mentally well balanced every

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

single day. So I think, a very important point to consider for

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

everyone, because we're all dealing with emails with

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

technologies and with cybercrime, but also the people

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

making the trainings or searching for the right

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

solutions.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Very true, very true. Let me try to tease

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

out some inferences from this discussion, from the standpoint

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

of cybersecurity governance. First, humans are very complex

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

beings, their behavior will not be consistent, will change with

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

context, with situations, with the environment. And that has to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

be factored in whether you are conducting a training program,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

whether you're developing a technical solution. But what

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

does that mean? That means you recognize that even the best of

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

solutions, if it has a human involvement, can fail at a

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

certain point in time on a certain day, because that

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

particular person wasn't on their best game, something had

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

happened, something had taken over they had, they were

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

vulnerable, they felt weak for for a variety of different

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

reasons. So therefore, the more I think about it, it makes sense

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

to have a zero trust approach, a zero trust framework, because

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that's assuming that whether you trust or you don't trust, and if

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

those things keep changing for a variety of reasons, we can't

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

control that, but at least let's build or establish the checks

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

and balances. To use your words, let's be pragmatic about it, and

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

take a very practical approach, instal the necessary barriers

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

through different types of controls. So we can still

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

protect the organization, protect assets, and other

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

resources from attacks that might happen because of human

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

vulnerabilities. So that's kind of my long drawn, circuitous

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

explanation or inferences of what we've been talking about.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Would you like to add to that? Yeah, exactly.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

We need to accept that it's not black or

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

All right. Well, as much as I would love to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

white. We're in an area that is rather gray and, some one person

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

that can be very good at a phishing tests might still get

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

caught at some point, depending on the context, depending on how

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

well the criminal also built the campaign, because maybe it's

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

continue this discussion, we are coming to the end of our time

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

targeted, and they've done a great job of intelligence, and

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

they know how to trick that person. Yeah. So we need to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

accept that and having Yeah, indeed, different layers of

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

security, technical and human, allow to balance, when one of

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

the two fails, and it will at some point, and also, yeah,

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

having ways to recover properly. That's very important.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

allotted here. So I'd like to give you the opportunity to

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

summarize or say anything that you'd like the listeners to take

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

away from this discussion.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Yes, thank you. So I think for the general

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

audience, it's very important to become more aware of social

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

engineering as a threat, because we're all facing it. And

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

consequences can be very damaging, it's important to

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

understand that it's important for everyone to understand that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

they can actually have some sort of control on it as little as

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

checking your emails more properly, or knowing that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

checking the email address, for example, can save you from a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

phishing link, or just not clicking without checking, like

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

this different kinds of things. And it's important for I think,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

authorities in general to understand that, yes, some

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

people that work in the corporate environment will get

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

some trainings, more or less effective, still at this stage,

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

but they will and they have more awareness as well on that. But

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

the whole population needs to get more awareness and training

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

in general on social engineering. And then if we're

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

thinking about decision makers and companies, yeah, understand

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

that your employees are human beings. And you got people

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

understand that human beings are not just yeah, one or zero, that

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

they will fail at times, they are more complex than it's

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

really difficult to generalize, the only generalization we can

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

make is that there is no generalization that can be made.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

But then to end that summary, again, social engineering has

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

always existed, we need to be very pragmatic about it, we're

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

still falling for the old tricks. There is some innovation

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

and we need to keep an eye on these developments. But there is

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

something we can do about it. We have that power. And to finish

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

on a positive note, I would say that I have also experienced in

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

my surroundings, whether professional or personal, way

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

more awareness and good practices coming from different

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

types of people. So I think we're on the right track. We

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

just need to keep on working on it and accepting that it's a

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

gray area and having a multidisciplinary approach.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Fantastic. Thank you so much, Beatrice, for

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

your time and your thoughts. I look forward to many more such

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

conversations.

 

 


Beatrice Cadet:

Thank you for having me.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

A special thanks to Beatrice cadet, for

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

her time and insights. If you liked what you heard, please

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

leave the podcast a rating and share it with your network.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Also, subscribe to the show. So you don't miss any new episodes.

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

Thank you for listening, and I'll see you in the next

 

 


Dr. Dave Chatterjee:

episode.

 

 


Introducer:

The information contained in this podcast is for

 

 


Introducer:

general guidance only. The discussants assume no

 

 


Introducer:

responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the

 

 


Introducer:

content of this podcast. The information contained in this

 

 


Introducer:

podcast is provided on an as-is basis with no guarantee of

 

 


Introducer:

completeness, accuracy, usefulness, or timeliness. The

 

 


Introducer:

opinions and recommendations expressed in this podcast are

 

 


Introducer:

those of the discussants and not of any organization.